The President of the Chamber of Deputies these days has completed a choice which was acquired in April 2010, when in the governing bodies of the PDL had claimed the right to express autonomous positions and create a current. Betrayed by much of the leadership of AN was seen marginalized. Commentators gave it to politically dead.
What happened that did not work in political calculation of Berlusconi and former colonels Finian? An apparently very simple: Fini has distanced himself from a vision of politics based on directing the typical corporate culture.
Even Adriano Olivetti, enlightened entrepreneur, lauded by the left, when he received criticism, as he recently recalled Giorgio Bocca, he remembered to be the master. Imagine if Berlusconi could tolerate the democratic process within his party and recognition for the role of the antagonist.
A Fini, after a tiring journey, it is very clear that the state and political forces that animate vision, in this part of the West, are the result of a political culture based on a democratic vision ( pluralism, respect for legality, the construction of shared projects, freedom, etc...)
A Berlusconi escape many of the principles of a democratic culture. As a businessman believes that the institutions public, once won the elections fall under the right of private property.
first casino, then Rutelli, now Fini, have challenged the two-party system and the vision of owner introduced by Berlusconi. What solution will be adopted and that the electoral law to redraw the political balance has become topical. the background of this story there is running out and then the two-party system as we have seen in recent decades
It is against this background that we need to ask questions. Why would a group of politicians decides to jeopardize his political career? What advantage of career they think they can draw from this situation, or by new terms of context?
The PDL is a party where you run personal rewards loyalty. To procure and distribute the benefits is the deputy leader, that this privilege based on his power. As a family business management receives bonuses if contributing to corporate strategies and create benefits that Members receive their prizes if they work to achieve the objectives of the head of government (read ad personam).
With the collapse of the nineties and the inclusion in the public life of many managers came parliament in this culture that has aspired to dominate the entire political universe. A culture that has permeated even the opposition.
If the Democratic Party is in trouble is because he challenged the cultural left that his vision was based on certain universal values \u200b\u200bconsidered. Veltroni's unfortunate political culture that brought the left to a small, worse than 1948, but modernity.
Policy makers, they are called Casini, Rutelli are called, are called Fini, who broke with Berlusconi understood that if they want to continue their political career must reconstruct the rules that govern market policy, otherwise they will never be competitive. Likewise, the Members who have followed them.
In all this we must rebuild the relationships between men and women of the left who want to represent their people, citizens, and to call for greater coherence and mainly to the increased cultural and political autonomy. We need to build a new spirit of democratic public. And enough of this superiority of the corporate culture. There are women and men around the world who make a big deal every day of solidarity, justice and equality. Return to the "fundamentals" is not rhetoric.
0 comments:
Post a Comment