messages I get angry about what happened in parliament on the agenda and presented by Antonio Borghesi discussed on October 26 last year, which proposed to abolish the feudal privilege for Members of the check in office for life and for those resigned from office. I agree, drop the "right" / privilege to retire after a term of five years was proof that the parliament sit in the "best" and not a caste. But it is asking too much
from facts. The Chamber of Deputies is composed as it is known by 630 deputies, 26 were the days present in 525. We take the first fact: the 105 (16.6%) absent we do not know (how to distribute the absent between majority and opposition?), But we can say that they were not in parliament. If proof were needed, we note a significant absenteeism because of the political class.
The vote took place by secret ballot, the request for an open vote was rejected, 525 of these five abstained, voters were then 520. Because the motion of the exponent IDV was sufficient to pass a majority of 261 votes. Ben 498 votes were rejected or. Dg Borghesi, and then the abolition of the board ladies (and their spouses) after only one term.
Discovering that the representatives of the center are no different from those of the center and that their concrete actions are the same when it comes to defending the privileges arouses moral outrage and disillusionment. I concur. But not enough.
After 18 years since the 1992 crisis, when the responsibility for the degeneration of the political system was given to the parties that had ruled during the First Republic, we discover that even the political class that would occur as new, and right shares responsibility for the left drift of the moral crisis of the nation.
First observation: the justicialism League (the loop in parliament) and the national right of the one part and that of "joyful war machine" of the PCI / PDS, which strongly supported the justicialism prosecutors did not help the modernization of the country but the political class to replace the political class. It has not initiated a new phase in the history of Italy, indeed, we are entirely in the deception of '92. Sad conclusion.
Second observation: the leaders of the Democratic Party that they should be, according to Veltroni, the hope of renewal act like elected Berlusconi. Another sad conclusion.
draw your attention to what once would have been said to be the principal contradiction and that is the current attempt to destroy the fabric of constitutional and public ethics. Voting in favor of maintaining caste privileges does this mean. I'm sorry for the many friends of the Pd (I know I will receive much criticism, but I refuse to believe that they are not able to understand what I mean).
When Veltroni addresses from the pages of the Corriere della Sera, August 24, 2010, as follows: I would write Italians just because I feel I have at least basis for it. In the bottom two years ago, a century of this time, light and bulimic, almost fourteen million Italians made a cross on the symbol that contained my name as a candidate for the Presidency of the Council , writes constitutional heresy, a false, why should he know that the chairman of the board is expressed by the parliament .
It's no different from what Berlusconi said in recent days using the same argument when it claims total immunity to avoid being judged by the judiciary.
The Veltroni and Berlusconi which mirrors the ideology of which needs to be liberated in order to reconstruct a field of forces of the socialist left, reformist democratic and capable of protecting the constitutional spirit and redefine the public ethic. If you do not understand this premise it is in the field of moral indignation, noble sentiment, but lacking in political efficacy.
Only this premise may determine the conditions for an aggregation of forces in the area of \u200b\u200bthe left in a position to define already existing economic, social, cultural, overcoming personal narcissism and archaic ideology. This is the task may pose a political class not polluted by commercialism and personal interests.
The formation of a new political elite can not pass through cooptation to merit conformist, as has happened so far. We must start from the "radical change of the idea of \u200b\u200bpower and social privilege."
How? Through the de-professionalization of politics, in essence it is to introduce rules that will reduce the policy space and depotenzino understood and largely reduced to economic opportunities.
This is not to deny resources to those who want to do politics, but to avoid the political class is organized based on the exchange of patronage (Zagrebelsky G., in "the Republic, 26.3.2010 ) as it does now.
is a long process, "heroic", for which it makes sense to engage. But sending mail to the indignant writers who travel in the ether an appeal does not fall back into new justice-and unnecessary moralizing. Reorganize the field of a left socialist, liberal, reformist with strong constitutional culture is a path, perhaps longer, but unavoidable.
